Dr Stefan Lanka - Measles On Trial
369 Views
26
Mirrored from Dharmabear, https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Measles-Virus-on-Trial-Dr-Stefan-Lanka:e?r=9j3kT5rT5w4RcYeQFUtizhB7Uv1os6cJ
In the five-year "measles virus trial" the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart on February 16. 2016 sensationally ruled that all allegations concerning the measles infection, measles vaccination, and the measles virus have no scientific basis.
At the end of Dr. Lanka's appeal hearing, the presiding judge Oleschkewitz said to the plaintiff Dr. Bardens that the court with three judges had decided 3:0 against him.
This is a novelty in German legal history. Never before has a court publicly stated whether it decided 3:0, 0:3, 2:1 or 1:2. The emotions of the judge are not surprising when one reads up on the subject and becomes aware of the dimensions of the medical malpractice. From a biological point of view, it is not surprising that the presiding judge lost his voice when reading out the verdict. He went "in recess."
You can find the important judgment of the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart, AZ .: 12 U 63/15 from 16.02.2016 here:
http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1
On December 1. 2016, the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe confirmed the sensational ruling of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court.
You can find the Federal Court's decision here:
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/BGH_Beschluss_I_ZR_62-16.pdf
It has been German case law since December 1, 2016, that even the first publication in the measles virus trial, the publication of the Nobel Prize winner John Franklin Enders and his colleagues from 1954, does not constitute proof of the alleged existence of the suspected "measles virus."
What makes this fact so significant is that this publication is the sole and exclusive basis of all other approximately 30,000 "scientific" publications on the topic of "measles virus" and "infection" with measles.
Since it is now case law that this publication contains no proof of the alleged existence of the assumed measles virus, it is clear that all 30,000 specialist publications on these topics are without foundation.
"Dismantling The Virus Theory - The “measles virus” as an example"
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Dr. Stefan Lanka:
https://wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de
In the five-year "measles virus trial" the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart on February 16. 2016 sensationally ruled that all allegations concerning the measles infection, measles vaccination, and the measles virus have no scientific basis.
At the end of Dr. Lanka's appeal hearing, the presiding judge Oleschkewitz said to the plaintiff Dr. Bardens that the court with three judges had decided 3:0 against him.
This is a novelty in German legal history. Never before has a court publicly stated whether it decided 3:0, 0:3, 2:1 or 1:2. The emotions of the judge are not surprising when one reads up on the subject and becomes aware of the dimensions of the medical malpractice. From a biological point of view, it is not surprising that the presiding judge lost his voice when reading out the verdict. He went "in recess."
You can find the important judgment of the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart, AZ .: 12 U 63/15 from 16.02.2016 here:
http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1
On December 1. 2016, the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe confirmed the sensational ruling of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court.
You can find the Federal Court's decision here:
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/BGH_Beschluss_I_ZR_62-16.pdf
It has been German case law since December 1, 2016, that even the first publication in the measles virus trial, the publication of the Nobel Prize winner John Franklin Enders and his colleagues from 1954, does not constitute proof of the alleged existence of the suspected "measles virus."
What makes this fact so significant is that this publication is the sole and exclusive basis of all other approximately 30,000 "scientific" publications on the topic of "measles virus" and "infection" with measles.
Since it is now case law that this publication contains no proof of the alleged existence of the assumed measles virus, it is clear that all 30,000 specialist publications on these topics are without foundation.
"Dismantling The Virus Theory - The “measles virus” as an example"
https://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
Dr. Stefan Lanka:
https://wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de