TRUTH IN MEDIA - THE BIGGEST PROBLEM WITH NWO COVID VACCINES - BEN SWANN
970 Views
50
Original "Ben Swann" ---> https://youtu.be/NZNaXS1T6JE
If the vaccines does not stop the spread of the virus or stop the need for masks and social distancing what is the purpose of the VACCINE!
Sharp Reductions in COVID-19 Case Fatalities and Excess Deaths in Peru in Close Time Conjunction, State-By-State, with Ivermectin Treatments ---> https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765018
Pfizer Admits Vaccine Does Not Prevent COVID ---> https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/29/pfizer-admits-vaccine-does-not-prevent-covid.aspx
329 Deaths 9,516 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show ---> https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/329-deaths-9516-other-injuries-reported-following-covid-vaccine-cdc/
JarrodDSchneider - Comment on this video on YT.
I have carefully studied the development of the covid vaccines and many things about them are very concerning to me:
First of all, up until this point there has never been a successful vaccine for corona viruses, due to a problem typical of corona vaccines called antibody dependent enhancement or ADE. In animal trials for previous vaccines, the animals were vaccinated and seemed to have a good antibody response, but upon exposure to the wild virus, they developed a paradoxical immune enhancement leading to severe inflammation in all the organs of their body (especially the lungs), and they died. There is no way to know if these vaccines cause ADE because it wasn’t tested for in the trials. Due to emergency protocol, the usual practice of testing animals prior to humans was bypassed and the potential for ADE was not directly addressed in human trial participants. Historical precedent would suggest, however, that ADE is a distinct possibility, and we may not know the true negative effects until years down the road when vaccinated persons are exposed to genetically similar versions of corona virus.
Second, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles that are “PEGylated”, meaning the nanoparticles are coated with PEG (polyethylene glycol). PEGs can lead to a life threatening anaphylactic reaction. Such reactions are already occurring during the initial vaccine rollout and PEGs are the most likely culprit. Approximately 72% of the US population have PEG antibodies, with 8% having extremely elevated levels (more than 500 ng/mL), putting them at risk for severe allergic reaction and/or future autoimmune conditions. These reactions were totally predictable, with many experts warning of the danger posed by PEGs, yet participants with a history of severe allergic reaction were excluded from the trials; this served to obscure the actual negative impact PEGs will have now that these vaccines are being given to members of the public who have not been screened for PEG antibodies. Additionally, PEG nanoparticles are integral components for state of the art biosurveillance technology currently being developed by DARPA and companies like Profusa that are seeking FDA approval. To me, it is quite strange and concerning that these vaccines contain PEGs (as an adjuvant), given the connections I just mentioned. I do not relish the prospect of being injected with nanoparticles given their association with the biosurveillance technology of the military industrial complex.
Third, it is impossible to ascertain long term safety because of the foreshortened timeframe of Operation Warp Speed. Vaccines should be tested for 5 to 10 years to adequately assess their longterm effects. Short term safety is questionable too, as much of the data is still unavailable, and the current reports on safety and efficacy essentially amount to self-reported press releases from these companies themselves.
Fourth, the efficacy number of 90% for Pfizer and 94% for Moderna, is a statistical trick, reporting relative risk reduction instead of the real reduction of absolute risk (for more info, see below*). Also, the trials only assessed these vaccines’ ability to prevent mild symptoms and NOT their ability to prevent viral transmission. If they don’t prevent people from transmitting the virus (especially when safer, cheaper drugs like Ivermectin do) what’s the point?
Fifth, these are NOT vaccines in the normal sense. They are mRNA vaccines, a completely different process for achieving disease protection; mRNA vaccines seek to introduce messenger RNA into the body in order to “trick” cells into producing immunogens, which then stimulate an immune response. These vaccines are the first of their kind ever to be authorized and distributed to this many people. Those getting vaccinated are essentially an extension of phase 3 of the trials. Because of the lack of long term safety assessment and the new nature of this technology, people are participating in a mass human experiment with no way of knowing for sure all the terrible long term health effects these could cause. Many problems from vaccines are known to have an incubatory period and do not manifest until much later on, which is why these need to be tested for multiple years to actually assess risk. One such problem currently being discussed is the mRNA technology’s possible impact on fertility, as the spike protein it encourages your body to make is very similar to a protein crucial for placental development. This could interfere with the reproductive process. The vaccines’ impact on fertility is currently unknown as animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.
Sixth, there was a signature for many different problems seen in the various trials and initial rollout for these vaccines, problems that are concurrent with commonly documented vaccine injuries. Injuries that did occur in the various trials included, but were not limited to, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, and transverse myelitis.
* Regarding the reporting on the reduction of relative risk instead of absolute risk, in the phase 3 trial of the Pfizer vaccine, for example, 22,000 people were vaccinated and 22,000 were given placebo, for a total of 44,000 trial participants. Of those 44,000, just 170 were diagnosed as having covid-19 post-vaccination. Of those 170, it was reported that 8 received the vaccine and 162 received the placebo. From this ratio it was inferred that the vaccine would prevent 154 out of 162 from getting the disease for an efficacy of greater than 90%. But even as the British Medical Journal explained, “A relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%”. It is very concerning that a vaccine is being given to tens or potentially hundreds of millions of people based on a figure derived from only 170 trial participants (just 0.38% of the total participants in the trial).
If the vaccines does not stop the spread of the virus or stop the need for masks and social distancing what is the purpose of the VACCINE!
Sharp Reductions in COVID-19 Case Fatalities and Excess Deaths in Peru in Close Time Conjunction, State-By-State, with Ivermectin Treatments ---> https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765018
Pfizer Admits Vaccine Does Not Prevent COVID ---> https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/29/pfizer-admits-vaccine-does-not-prevent-covid.aspx
329 Deaths 9,516 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show ---> https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/329-deaths-9516-other-injuries-reported-following-covid-vaccine-cdc/
JarrodDSchneider - Comment on this video on YT.
I have carefully studied the development of the covid vaccines and many things about them are very concerning to me:
First of all, up until this point there has never been a successful vaccine for corona viruses, due to a problem typical of corona vaccines called antibody dependent enhancement or ADE. In animal trials for previous vaccines, the animals were vaccinated and seemed to have a good antibody response, but upon exposure to the wild virus, they developed a paradoxical immune enhancement leading to severe inflammation in all the organs of their body (especially the lungs), and they died. There is no way to know if these vaccines cause ADE because it wasn’t tested for in the trials. Due to emergency protocol, the usual practice of testing animals prior to humans was bypassed and the potential for ADE was not directly addressed in human trial participants. Historical precedent would suggest, however, that ADE is a distinct possibility, and we may not know the true negative effects until years down the road when vaccinated persons are exposed to genetically similar versions of corona virus.
Second, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles that are “PEGylated”, meaning the nanoparticles are coated with PEG (polyethylene glycol). PEGs can lead to a life threatening anaphylactic reaction. Such reactions are already occurring during the initial vaccine rollout and PEGs are the most likely culprit. Approximately 72% of the US population have PEG antibodies, with 8% having extremely elevated levels (more than 500 ng/mL), putting them at risk for severe allergic reaction and/or future autoimmune conditions. These reactions were totally predictable, with many experts warning of the danger posed by PEGs, yet participants with a history of severe allergic reaction were excluded from the trials; this served to obscure the actual negative impact PEGs will have now that these vaccines are being given to members of the public who have not been screened for PEG antibodies. Additionally, PEG nanoparticles are integral components for state of the art biosurveillance technology currently being developed by DARPA and companies like Profusa that are seeking FDA approval. To me, it is quite strange and concerning that these vaccines contain PEGs (as an adjuvant), given the connections I just mentioned. I do not relish the prospect of being injected with nanoparticles given their association with the biosurveillance technology of the military industrial complex.
Third, it is impossible to ascertain long term safety because of the foreshortened timeframe of Operation Warp Speed. Vaccines should be tested for 5 to 10 years to adequately assess their longterm effects. Short term safety is questionable too, as much of the data is still unavailable, and the current reports on safety and efficacy essentially amount to self-reported press releases from these companies themselves.
Fourth, the efficacy number of 90% for Pfizer and 94% for Moderna, is a statistical trick, reporting relative risk reduction instead of the real reduction of absolute risk (for more info, see below*). Also, the trials only assessed these vaccines’ ability to prevent mild symptoms and NOT their ability to prevent viral transmission. If they don’t prevent people from transmitting the virus (especially when safer, cheaper drugs like Ivermectin do) what’s the point?
Fifth, these are NOT vaccines in the normal sense. They are mRNA vaccines, a completely different process for achieving disease protection; mRNA vaccines seek to introduce messenger RNA into the body in order to “trick” cells into producing immunogens, which then stimulate an immune response. These vaccines are the first of their kind ever to be authorized and distributed to this many people. Those getting vaccinated are essentially an extension of phase 3 of the trials. Because of the lack of long term safety assessment and the new nature of this technology, people are participating in a mass human experiment with no way of knowing for sure all the terrible long term health effects these could cause. Many problems from vaccines are known to have an incubatory period and do not manifest until much later on, which is why these need to be tested for multiple years to actually assess risk. One such problem currently being discussed is the mRNA technology’s possible impact on fertility, as the spike protein it encourages your body to make is very similar to a protein crucial for placental development. This could interfere with the reproductive process. The vaccines’ impact on fertility is currently unknown as animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.
Sixth, there was a signature for many different problems seen in the various trials and initial rollout for these vaccines, problems that are concurrent with commonly documented vaccine injuries. Injuries that did occur in the various trials included, but were not limited to, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, and transverse myelitis.
* Regarding the reporting on the reduction of relative risk instead of absolute risk, in the phase 3 trial of the Pfizer vaccine, for example, 22,000 people were vaccinated and 22,000 were given placebo, for a total of 44,000 trial participants. Of those 44,000, just 170 were diagnosed as having covid-19 post-vaccination. Of those 170, it was reported that 8 received the vaccine and 162 received the placebo. From this ratio it was inferred that the vaccine would prevent 154 out of 162 from getting the disease for an efficacy of greater than 90%. But even as the British Medical Journal explained, “A relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%”. It is very concerning that a vaccine is being given to tens or potentially hundreds of millions of people based on a figure derived from only 170 trial participants (just 0.38% of the total participants in the trial).