⁣The transcript below is of a call made to Brian Gerrish on 18
April 2021. The voice of the caller has been changed to protect her
identity.

The senior NHS Board member warns that the government is now
controlling the NHS, and it is the government that is actually
dictating what the NHS should do during Covid emergency
measures. She states that the result of the government's enforced
Covid and vaccination policies can be described as genocide.
Government messaging to her senior NHS colleagues is removing
their capacity for rational thought, and they are effectively being
mind controlled to implement policies which, in more rational
moments, they would challenge as wrong. Fear prevails, and she
and her board colleagues are being expected to toe an unwritten
policy line, set predominantly in conference calls with no written
record. She warns that if her privately troubled colleagues do not
speak out, "your children will be next".

Brian Gerrish: I’ve been contacted by an NHS
professional who would like to speak to me about things happening in
the NHS. So, without any ado, let’s go over to our caller today.
Thank you very much for calling me. It’s really been wonderful
that you’ve had the confidence to give us a call at the UK Column.
I’m going to ask the key question: why have
you called me today?

Whistleblower: Yes, thank you. I was listening to
— I think it was your
Wednesday [14 April] broadcast, and the nurse testimony that you
had on there, and it really resonated with me. My heart really hurt,
and understood what she was going through. You know, she obviously
had UK-wide knowledge of the NHS, and a lot of knowledge of
what’s going on within her job.
So, as you said, I’m an NHS professional, and I actually sit on
an NHS Board.
I guess the other reason for reaching out was that she talked a
couple of times about “the next layer of management” being the
Board. I think she reported in to one of the Board. You know, I just
really wanted to share my personal story on what’s
happened since last March.

Brian Gerrish: That, of course, is wonderful,
because information coming directly from people who are professionals
in the system is extremely valuable. I’m going to say to you
straight away that I realise that doing this is an enormous pressure,
so thank you, and we respect that.
So, you talk about what you feel comfortable to share with the
audience.

Whistleblower: OK, thank you. So, I guess when
all the Coronavirus started, and when it came into the UK —
mainframing kind of March last year — obviously the conversations
really were predominantly about measures to stop infection,
forecasting, you know, “this is what we’re anticipating will
happen”, you know, “how do we manage the services”. Kind of all
that was going on, and then as we went through the summer, there
started to be a little bit of talk about the vaccine development and
potential treatments and things like that.
And then the treatments completely went, and the vaccine
discussions ramped up, and in November it really started to be
predominantly what we talked about. And, I mean, you can’t call
it a vaccine, because it doesn’t meet the definition, so I’m
going to refer to it as an injection, but I’m just making sure that
everyone’s on the same page with me.
So, it became kind of clear to myself, and a few other colleagues
that I know on other NHS Boards, in November that we were going
to be asked to completely roll this out — and also that there
really were some long-term safety issues, and stuff that we just
didn’t know. And so it really took us by surprise,
the scope and speed at which
they were moving.
And at the time, we had a lot of discussions, as a Board, as to
our concerns around this — and remember that when the NHS is in
emergency measures, which it is and has been, then the Government is
able to tightly control what the NHS does, and is able to dictate a
lot more what the NHS does than it would be able to if it wasn’t in
emergency measures.
So, our Chief Executive had discussions about our concerns, and I
can say other Boards had the same discussions, and in a nutshell,
what we were told in December was, “If you refuse to co-operate in
rolling this out, then we’ll remove you.” And it wasn’t said
explicitly, and it wasn’t put in e-mails, but it was certainly very
indicated that that was the case.

Brian Gerrish: So that was essentially a veiled
threat. I think you’d call that a veiled threat.

Whistleblower: Yes. And the second challenge we
had, very much, and central to a lot of our discussions, is that even
if we didn’t — if we said, “Look, we’re not doing this” —
then the public that we serve would be very angry, or the majority of
the public that we serve: certainly not all of
them, but the majority of the public that we
serve, would at that time have been very angry and
actually probably would have tried to help with
our removal, because they wanted this, and how
dare we try and hold that back for them!
So at that time, I kind of thought this through, and I thought,
“Well, I can either leave, because I don’t agree with it, or I
can stay and put my energy into ensuring things like informed
consent, ensuring that we were capturing any side effects correctly,
that we were giving balanced information to the public so that they
could make an informed decision.” And, you know, people were going
to take this no matter what I did, but perhaps in
being there and trying to focus on these areas, I
could make a difference.
So that was my position at that time, and then, as the months have
rolled by, the government pressure has mounted and mounted, and I
have challenged repetitively, and most of the time it’s brushed
aside; sometimes, people will be very flippant back; and sometimes,
there will just be silence. But I keep trying to challenge, using the
Government’s own data, using some of the policies, even looking at
this huge problem of Covid takes over everything, so that all the
other health services are not running as they should.
And what I’ve witnessed, really, as well, alongside this is just
a massive increase in propaganda, in false statements about it, a
complete lack of informed consent, side effects not being reported by
patients and NHS staff, and this normalisation of “If you are in
bed for two days, that’s OK”(!) And I don’t ever remember, when
we had the flu jab — you know, people going for the flu jab a
couple of years ago — if you were in bed for two days after having
the flu jab, that wouldn’t have been considered OK! But for the
Covid jab, that’s been normalised.

Brian Gerrish: That’s an extremely interesting
point.

Whistleblower: Mmm. So, basically, after these
discussions — I have been told on more than one occasion that I can
leave if I don’t agree, and “The consensus has been there; we
just need to get on with it now.” So it’s kind of moved from that
concern at the beginning, and what I’ve witnessed over the months
is people becoming more comfortable with this rollout, and “We just
need to get on with it, and this is what we need to do.”
And I witnessed a lot of to-ing and fro-ing from people around me.
Periods of concern and then they’ll get the documents down from the
Government, and then it’s like, “Oh, it’s fine, it’s fine.”
So almost like an internal battle happening with the colleagues
around me, that is causing a lot of stress and illness for them.

Brian Gerrish: Do some of your Board colleagues
have concerns about what’s going on?

Whistleblower: They did, and
they do at times, but what seems to happen is,
it’s like a rollercoaster ride. So there’ll be something
I’ll say, or something will happen, or something will be on the
news that will spring concern, but then once they’ve got the
government line on it, it will smooth that down somewhat. And that’s
what I’m challenged with. It’s like a cognitive dissonance where
the concern rises and then somebody soothes them and says, “That’s
OK, no, we’ve got this, and it’s fine.” And now we’re in this
sort of pattern of just waiting for, “Well, what’s the government
line on this?”
I think that’s really important, actually, for listeners to
understand, because I think that a lot of people think that the NHS
is in complete control of this, and actually don’t realise that
under emergency measures, they are told what to
do.

Brian Gerrish: That’s a very important point.
And how do they get told what to do? Presumably,
the policy comes in from the Government, and who does that go to?
Does it go to the Chief Executives?

Whistleblower: Yes, and the Director
of Public Safety or equivalent.

Brian Gerrish: So those individuals in particular
are the ones that, we’ll say, the government communications come
straight in to them, and they then have to sell
that policy on into the local NHS system itself.

Whistleblower: Yes.

Brian Gerrish: And how does the instruction come
in from the Government? Is that done by e-mail and letters, or is
this happening with direct phone calls, for example? Well, it would
be conference calls now, I suppose.

Whistleblower: Yes, so a mixture, but a lot of
the detail is usually on conference calls, and there’s not as much
sent in e-mails, in written e-mails on
policies.

Brian Gerrish: And just to focus things a little
bit: can you just give us a summary of what your concerns are? You’re
describing that things are not right, you’re talking about the
vaccines, and you’re saying people are spending two days in bed and
that would have been a problem for the normal flu vaccine but
nobody’s taking any notice of that. Just package what your concerns
are at the moment about what you’re seeing going on.

Whistleblower: Yes, there’s so many. I think
the key ones are lack of true informed consent, lack of a balanced
risk-versus-benefit ratio being given to people. I think people are
told that their adverse events are “normal”. I know that
the Yellow Card reporting system is not reflective
of the amount of adverse events that are actually happening, and I’ll
give you an example of that. I know of a patient who reported their
extreme adverse-event side effect to a nurse, and that nurse did
not report it to the Yellow Card reporting system. So
that’s a concern, that we haven’t got an accurate reflection of
what is actually happening after these injections.
And I think the long-term safety effects of these injections
is still not known, yet we can see that the
short-term impact is huge. And we’re now moving into a
territory where we are going into healthy, younger, fertile
individuals, and — God forbid — children. And that, quite
frankly, terrifies me.

Brian Gerrish: Yes, and I think there are other
people who feel this as well, because they could say, “Well, OK, we
know there’s adverse effects at the moment.” Still, if we were to
take the position that the number and the nature of the adverse
effects to date is acceptable against the benefits (whatever we think
those benefits are), they key bit that the public does not know is
what any future adverse reactions will be.

Whistleblower: Yes, that’s exactly right. And I
think that is used to say, “Well, look, we haven’t had that many
adverse events versus the millions that we’ve vaccinated” — but
it’s not a true representation, and so you can’t really draw
those parallels.

Brian Gerrish: How do the working staff — you
principally talked about the reaction from quite a senior level in
the NHS — how is all this affecting the doctors and nurses on the
ground, in the wards? The people who are having to deal with adverse
reactions, but people who are also having to give the vaccinations:
how is it affecting them?

Whistleblower: This is where I agreed with your
caller on 14 April. Most people are just following what they’re
asked to do, and — even at Board level — don’t know what’s in
these injections. I’ve tested that theory and found it to be true.
What we’re seeing at the moment is, from my perspective, a very
exhausted workforce which is told different things constantly.
I’ll give you an example, too, that I was extremely concerned
about recently. People with dry, cracking hands from the amount of
hand-washing that they’re having to do; constant face mask wearing,
causing huge skin problems; massive headaches; a lot of people off
sick — and the pressure that is going into the system is huge.

Brian Gerrish: Effects that you’re describing,
of people who are ending up with sore, cracked hands (and I’ve
heard about this from many other people in the NHS): I know that the
sanitising gels that they’re using can have different effects, but
one of the key ones is they tend to dry people’s skin out, and if
you’re using them all the time, you end up with cracked skin. Of
course, if you’ve got cracked skin, that’s going to make you very
vulnerable as an additional path to infection, with the people you’re
dealing with as a healthcare professional.
What about who would deal with this? Health and Safety Executive,
or who’s responsible in the NHS for responding to those sorts of
concerns about the wearing of masks and what’s happening to
people’s hands as a result of the sanitisation?

Whistleblower: Well, the department that will
oversee that on the wards is Infection Control. And that will then go
up into the Medical Board.

Brian Gerrish: And are they producing any
reports? Are they doing their job and it’s then being squashed, or
are they simply not doing their job?

Whistleblower: I couldn’t say precisely, but
from what I’ve understood, a lot of people are complaining about it
but it’s not being logged officially. So I look at my cracked
hands, but it’s not being logged officially. And I think there
is fear about logging these things, and there is a
mind control, almost, about “Well, you’ve got to
do it, because otherwise you could be responsible for this spread
of this infection, or this person dying.” I feel
that the pressure is huge.

Brian Gerrish: I don’t want to put any words in
your mouth, because you are here to tell your experience, so I’ll
phrase things very carefully. At the beginning, when the
pandemic was declared, how did that affect people?

Whistleblower: I think there was a
level of fear, but actually, I feel like the fear has increased,
because the propaganda and the news outlets and the pressure from the
Government has increased. It’s almost like you’re seeing the fear
and pressure increase at the same time. So, if you said
to me, “How did people react in April last year versus how are
people now?”, they’re much worse now in terms
of their overall health, their mental wellbeing, and their fear
levels.

Brian Gerrish: That is a very sad and serious
state of affairs. What comes into my mind immediately is the SPI-B 22
March 2020 paper that was put into the SAGE board
meeting, whatever they call it, where it specifically said that the
idea was that the fear factor was going to be ramped up in the
population as a whole. It said, “People are not fearful
enough; we need to make them more fearful in
order to effectively get the policy into place.”
Now, most people that we’ve circulated and broadcast that
document to, of course, read it as a member of the public, and they
look at it that that was the government message as to how to deal
with the public — but I think it’s not
unreasonable to say that these psychological policies were also
directly injected into the NHS, and indeed other parts of the
Government and civil service. But if we just focus on the NHS, this
applied psychology was brought directly into the NHS, and we have
been given (and we’ve found for ourselves) quite a few documents
within various NHS Trusts in England describing how they’re
going to use applied behavioural psychology to progress the Covid and
vaccination care programme within the hospitals.
So this deliberate applied psychology policy was not just
for the general public; it’s come in through the NHS as well, it
seems to me.

Whistleblower: Yes, and I think those types
of things aren’t completely obvious, but I can certainly give you
examples where I’ve had very rational conversations with my peers
and then we can sit down a couple of days later and that rational
conversation has gone. And I’m having
an irrational one that doesn’t make sense; it’s
based on fear or emotions or something that’s changed — from what
they have been told in other meetings, or what’s gone on in
briefings.
So I can’t comment on that directly that it’s so visible,
but it certainly seems that there’s evidence that — I just feel
like most people in the NHS seem very irrational in their
choices and what they’re choosing to continue to do. And that’s
not an excuse for them, by any manner of means, but, you know, even
at a very senior level in the NHS, people are not thinking
rationally, and they definitely are having an element of psychology
that’s been driven behind this.

Brian Gerrish: If we take the case of people in
the NHS who’ve already had the vaccine, when they had their
vaccine, were they actually aware of the true detail of the adverse
effects via the Yellow Card system? Do people inside the NHS know
more about the vaccines, when they’re vaccinated, than, say, an
ordinary member of the public would?

Whistleblower: This was the other thing that
resonated with your Wednesday caller. No, they don’t.
I have asked multiple people, from people actually injecting to
people that sit on the Board, and they don’t know
what’s in the vaccines, and they don’t really
understand the risks. I’d also say that most people that I speak to
in a senior management position in the NHS have said, “I was
fifty-fifty about whether to take it or not.”
So, at some level, there is a subconscious belief that it might
not be safe, in my opinion, because there’s a lot of fifty-fifty,
but as time has worn on, they’ve taken it. So a lot of people have
taken it later, rather than in the first wave, when it was being
offered to healthcare professionals. And, of course, now they sit in
that bucket of people that would potentially not want to know about
adverse events for themselves, because they’ve taken
that injection.

Brian Gerrish: One would have thought that inside
the NHS system, particularly as you go up the management chain,
people would absolutely know about the Yellow Card adverse reaction
records. It’s on the Government website; the NHS does make an
oblique reference through to the Yellow Card system through their own
part of the public NHS website, but even when you get to the MHRA
part, you’ve really got to look for the datasheets themselves.
I still find it incredible, the idea that people in in the NHS have
not actually seen those sheets themselves!

Whistleblower: Yes, exactly, and when I have
brought up and presented on these things, and tried to get some
movement, the thing that comes back a lot is, “Well, yes, you know,
there’s only a few, there’s this, there’s that, but actually,
we’re vaccinating millions of people.” Now, even if you take into
account that the reporting isn’t accurate, when we think about
any other drug in history that has gone through the NHS, it
would not be acceptable for that many people to
die, full stop. And yet, in this circumstance, for some reason,
it is acceptable.

Brian Gerrish: Well, it’s put across as
acceptable.

Whistleblower: Absolutely. I mean, it’s not,
but yes.

Brian Gerrish: The other caller raised the issue
that patients were not being fully informed, and the Patient
Information Leaflets were not being given, so people didn’t really
get anything when they got their vaccination.
Possibly, they got something after they were
vaccinated, but they weren’t being given information before which
would enable them to make that all-important informed choice. Have
you also been seeing, or are you aware of the fact, that the public
are being vaccinated without being given the full information? I
think you did mention that earlier in this conversation, so apologies
if I’m getting you to repeat that, but I think it’s an important
thing.

Whistleblower: Yes, that was one of the things
that I felt that if I stayed, I could maybe have an influence on:
ensuring that that is happening. And I think that, to a certain
extent, my calls have been heard on that, but it’s
still woefully inadequate. People are often given the leaflet twenty
minutes, fifteen minutes, before they have the injection. They’re
already in the vaccination centre. It’s a very slick operation.
They’re told it’ll just be OK. You know, there’s no time for
deep reflection or questions.

Brian Gerrish: Are you able to say anything about
pregnant women? Pregnancy has been one of the hot topics, and of
course pregnant women are particularly vulnerable, the child is
vulnerable. Have you got anything you can tell us about that, or are
pregnant women going through the system and being vaccinated along
with everybody else?

Whistleblower: I don’t have any knowledge of
that, no.

Brian Gerrish: Well, you’ve been very brave in
speaking out, and it’s wonderful, because of course every time
somebody speaks out, somebody’s listening, and says, “Oh, my
goodness, I know about this,” and so they are prepared to also
speak out. So, I very much hope that what you’ve done with us today
will trigger that response in somebody else.
If you had a magic wand, what would you like to see happen at the
moment to help resolve what’s going on?

Whistleblower: If I had a magic wand, it would
just stop. It would stop now, before we
hurt anybody else. That would be amazing. That would be the best day
ever, because every day I wake up, I think about how I can find that
golden nugget to try and wake up the people around me to
the damage we are causing. We are causing — I
mean, we heard the word ‘genocide’ from the lady on Wednesday. I
don’t disagree with that statement. And it’s terrifying, and it
saddens me, and the reason I’m staying where I am for now is to try
and make a difference in whatever way I can, but — like she said,
and I would absolutely agree with this — I want to see that
judgment day. I will give evidence.
And also, I will take whatever comes to me for still staying and
being part of that, but I will continue where I can to try and make
any small gains that I can for the public that we’re serving,
because to give up and walk away isn’t going to get the right
outcome either. And so, if I can make little differences until I can
stand it no more, then that’s what I will do.

Brian Gerrish: Thank you for sharing that with
us. And — I’m going to put it in professional terms — if we
could do the right things and get the whole process to stop at the
moment, am I right in saying that would be the opportunity that we
could — as a nation, as the NHS — have a pause, draw breath, and
then actually look at what has been happening, analyse it properly,
and really decide whether the policies that have been enacted were
mistaken or whether they have been deliberately put into being; are
they malicious? That we can have a full analysis
of what’s happened.

Whistleblower: Yes, that’s right, that’s
right. And I think the danger, as well, here is that for a segment of
the population, they will bundle this in with, you know, “All
vaccines are bad”, or “All this is bad” or “All that is bad”.
And there are amazing things happening in the NHS
each and every day that does save lives. People
are committed and caring. And so, you could lose all of
that with what’s going on, and we need that stop
and to really, really re-evaluate.
And, you know, the other thing is, we need to find each
other. The people that are desperately trying to make a
difference and desperately trying to scream at the top of our voices,
“Please, please stop!” We need to find each
other, and it’s very difficult, because we’re quite spread out,
we’re demonised, we’re told to shut up, in every job,
and that makes the process a lot more challenging.

Brian Gerrish: Well, I can only thank you, but I
really mean it, because it is difficult to speak
out. You have given a really comprehensive run through what you’ve
seen happening, and your summing-up at the end there, I think, is
just wonderful, because, yes, we need to bring people together.
What advice would you give to somebody who is thinking about
having the vaccination — that’s my first question — and the
second question is, what advice would you have for somebody who’s
already had the vaccination?

Whistleblower: I think the advice for the first
question is, “Do your own research.” I think, as a nation, we’re
over-reliant on our healthcare professionals. And that’s not a
get-out clause, but, you know, you’re asking me how we empower
somebody to really take control — because it’s their body,
right, it’s their body — and absolutely, the
NHS is there to support them, but do your own research, and
do it wide. If you don’t know how to look at the clinical
studies, find somebody that does, and ask for support.
Challenge the people that ring you up and offer you
a vaccine. Challenge them, and ask them questions. We need to keep at
critical thinking for ourselves. That would be the biggest
thing. I’m not going to tell you what to do.
People ask me, and I’m not going to tell them.
I am going to say, “Look, this has no long-term
safety data, and there may be some challenges with
it. You’ve got to weigh up the risk-benefit ratio. Go and do your
own research as well!” I think that’s a key point.
If people aren’t able to do that, then I often just give them a
few areas they could go and look at, and I always try to be balanced
in that, because I think that’s important. You know, people need to
make their own minds up with this.

Brian Gerrish: So the second group is obviously
people who’ve had vaccines. We know that there
are a lot of people, a lot of
people: they’ve had vaccines, if they’ve had an adverse reaction,
they are really on the uptake of looking for the information and
trying to find out why, so they’re very motivated
people. But people who’ve had the vaccine maybe didn’t have any
adverse effects at all. Should they go ahead and take a second
vaccine?

Whistleblower: Again, I can’t tell them what to
do, but what I would say is, I’m seeing more and more traffic that
is questioning the safety after they’ve had the first dose, because
of the things that are in the news, and I have experience of people
who have had adverse events but haven’t spoken
up. And what I would say, on both counts, is: if you have an adverse
event, please report it, please speak
up. Don’t take no for an answer. For you,
and for others behind you. You know, you have the right,
and you should stand up and say, “This isn’t
good enough, and I need to report it, and you need
to ensure that people are being held to account for this as well.”
I think, for the second piece of that, so if people haven’t got
any effects and they’re worried, then I would advise them
to talk to somebody. Don’t sit in silence. Talk
to somebody, talk it through, do your research. That’s certainly
what I would do, and I would encourage anybody else to do that as
well.

Brian Gerrish: Well, that’s extremely helpful,
because of course in bringing these issues to light, we don’t want
to add to this overall stress and anxiety that people are suffering,
and I can imagine that if you’ve had a vaccine and then you are
hearing about adverse effects, that could really be weighing on your
mind.

Whistleblower: Yes, of course.

Brian Gerrish: So I fully understand: what you’re
saying there is, do your research so that you are happy in your own
mind.

Whistleblower: Yes.

Brian Gerrish: Is there anything else you’d
like to add? What you’ve given has been extremely interesting and
informative.

Whistleblower: No, I think the only thing I’d
like to add is: let’s get talking to each other and supporting each
other more. You know, let’s move out of the fear place, and try and
— I think a lot of people that have had the vaccines are sitting at
home, they’re scared and they’re worried, they don’t know what
to do, and they’re looking at the main news or they’re looking at
their NHS leaflet. And actually talking to people and getting support
and looking at a wide variety of information is just so important for
people, and it’ll make them feel like they have more control about
what happens to them, their body and their lives.

Brian Gerrish: And one thing that’s come into
my mind while you were talking there, so just allow me one very last
one: what advice, or what would you say to your NHS colleagues, to
encourage them to think about what’s going on?

Whistleblower: Honestly, what comes to mind is,
“Your children are next.” And that is terrifying, and it makes me
well up when I think about it. So if you won’t speak
up because you’ve had the vaccine, or you won’t speak up because
you’re scared (I understand that), or you won’t speak up because
you don’t want to lose your job (and I totally understand that),
just know that this doesn’t stop until we all stand up and say,
“Stop.” And we’re getting younger and younger here now, and our
time’s running out.

Brian Gerrish: Thank you very much for joining
me, and it’s been extremely helpful hearing the information that
you’ve got to put across. I know it’s taken a lot of courage, so
thank you very much.

Whistleblower: Thank you.