VOTE NO TO THE EU DIGITAL HEALTH PASSPORT - Rise Up Against the NWO!
540 Views
58
Source ---> https://www.facebook.com/100011389044151/videos/1612085905847695/
VOTE NO TO THE EU DIGITAL HEALTH PASSPORT!
1. Email your European Parliament Representatives and the LIBE committee and urge them to lift all COVID measures right now.
2. Write letters and call the MEPs.
3. Share this video and invite all your friends to take action.
In the comment section below, you will find email campaign content, as well as email addresses of the LIBE committee members. Following are three examples of why the health passport is immoral and unlawful proposal:
TWISTING THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK BY REVERSING THE PRESUMPTION OF GUILT
Requiring each EU citizens to show a EU health passport in order to confirm that:
- he or she obtained a negative PCR test,
- is vaccinated,
- is immunised after having contracted the virus.
leads to reversing the burden of proof that he or she is healthy/not guilty.
This is a strong presumption of guiltiness, everybody being considered a real threat to public health.
A Chinese study published on November 20th, 2020, made in Wuhan on the basis of 10 million people (representing 94.1% of the population of Wuhan, in a meta-analysis), has shown that asymptomatic people are not contaminating: the generalised practice of PCR tests within a population is therefore perfectly useless. [2]
[2] Shiyi Cao, Yong Gan, Chao Wang, Max Bachmann, Shanbo Wei, Jie Gong, Yuchai Huang, Tiantian Wang, Liqing Li, Kai Lu, Heng Jiang, Yanhong Gong, Hongbin Xu, Xin Shen, Qingfeng Tian, Chuanzhu Lv, Chanson de Fujian, Xiaoxv Yin & Zuxun Lu Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 5917 (2020): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
If individuals show symptoms of Covid-19 (i.e. "sick") as responsible for their own health they should ask for a doctor, be treated with one of the available treatments and possibly be isolated following the diagnosis of a physician, who is the only one authorized to make medical decisions for the patients concerned.
There is absolutely no need for an EU health passport reversing the burden of proof onto citizens.
States cannot hold an arbitrary power to prohibit citizens from leaving their homes nor to force them to stay in.
DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY FOR EU CITIZENS WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE TESTED OR VACCINATED
EU citizens who are in their right to refuse medical interventions (being tested or vaccinated) are condemned to stay at home. In terms of commonly applicable criminal law this is equivalent to house arrest.
This clearly violates the individual freedom of the EU citizens and thus their dignity and physical, psychological and moral integrity.
THE PRINCIPLE OF NO COERCION
EU citizens have the right to have their decisions taken responsibly, freely and voluntarily, on any actions affecting their health. They have the right to decide, whether or not to consent to the administration of a medical product, and “shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks.” They have the right to make decisions according to their own free will, at any time. (1)
(1) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, 1997 (Article 6)
The European Court of Human Rights has emphasised that a person’s bodily integrity concerns the most intimate aspects of one’s private life. (2)
(2) European Court of Human Rights Guide for article 8 – 31 august 2020 https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_8_ENG.pdf
The Digital Certificate clearly constrains EU citizens to make certain decisions about their health.
The Proposal not only underestimates their decision-making capacities and their responsibility for their health, but also sets up a condition on free movement if citizens do not allow intrusions into their body integrity.
Free movement is a fundamental right in the EU. If the Proposal allows free movement only to those who submit to medical interferences, this equals to use the coercive force in a covert and unacceptable way.
Indeed, the combined effects of the forced permanent testing and the impossibility to travel in the absence of a health test, strongly pressures the population to accept vaccination as the only sustainable solution to exercise their right to travel. This is therefore de facto, though not de jure coercion to get vaccinated.
As we see it, this Proposal of Digital Certificate tears fundamental rights apart from us and imposes a series of constraints i.e., an endless chain of testing or forced vaccination which violate the right to bodily integrity.
This is nothing to do with free will, consent or respect of fundamental rights. It is coercion.
THE PRINCIPLE OF HABEAS CORPUS MUST BE RESPECTED IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES
The Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum et recipiendum[1] states a fundamental right, according to which no one can be imprisoned without trial, as opposed to arbitrariness, which allows anyone to be arrested without just cause. Under the principle, anyone arrested has the right to know why he or she is arrested and what he or she is accused of.
[1] The origins of the "Habeas Corpus" go back to ancient Rome with the provocatio, which is its precursor, and its modern principle was born in english medieval Age.
No one shall be arbitrarily arrested, detained or exiled.
The judicial authority, guardian of individual freedom, ensures the respect of this principle under the conditions provided for by the law.
The Habeas Corpus proclaims the intervention of the judicial power in matters of individual /personal freedom and entrusts the judicial authority with the task of ensuring its protection.
In other words:
The law has the right to defeat only those actions that are harmful to society.
With the implementation of the EU Digital Certificate, EU citizens will be deprived of basic freedoms (ie home arrest) if they do not agree in showing a negative RT-PCR test, a proof of vaccination or a proof of recovery from illness.
VOTE NO TO THE EU DIGITAL HEALTH PASSPORT!
1. Email your European Parliament Representatives and the LIBE committee and urge them to lift all COVID measures right now.
2. Write letters and call the MEPs.
3. Share this video and invite all your friends to take action.
In the comment section below, you will find email campaign content, as well as email addresses of the LIBE committee members. Following are three examples of why the health passport is immoral and unlawful proposal:
TWISTING THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK BY REVERSING THE PRESUMPTION OF GUILT
Requiring each EU citizens to show a EU health passport in order to confirm that:
- he or she obtained a negative PCR test,
- is vaccinated,
- is immunised after having contracted the virus.
leads to reversing the burden of proof that he or she is healthy/not guilty.
This is a strong presumption of guiltiness, everybody being considered a real threat to public health.
A Chinese study published on November 20th, 2020, made in Wuhan on the basis of 10 million people (representing 94.1% of the population of Wuhan, in a meta-analysis), has shown that asymptomatic people are not contaminating: the generalised practice of PCR tests within a population is therefore perfectly useless. [2]
[2] Shiyi Cao, Yong Gan, Chao Wang, Max Bachmann, Shanbo Wei, Jie Gong, Yuchai Huang, Tiantian Wang, Liqing Li, Kai Lu, Heng Jiang, Yanhong Gong, Hongbin Xu, Xin Shen, Qingfeng Tian, Chuanzhu Lv, Chanson de Fujian, Xiaoxv Yin & Zuxun Lu Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China Nature Communications volume 11, Article number: 5917 (2020): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
If individuals show symptoms of Covid-19 (i.e. "sick") as responsible for their own health they should ask for a doctor, be treated with one of the available treatments and possibly be isolated following the diagnosis of a physician, who is the only one authorized to make medical decisions for the patients concerned.
There is absolutely no need for an EU health passport reversing the burden of proof onto citizens.
States cannot hold an arbitrary power to prohibit citizens from leaving their homes nor to force them to stay in.
DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY FOR EU CITIZENS WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE TESTED OR VACCINATED
EU citizens who are in their right to refuse medical interventions (being tested or vaccinated) are condemned to stay at home. In terms of commonly applicable criminal law this is equivalent to house arrest.
This clearly violates the individual freedom of the EU citizens and thus their dignity and physical, psychological and moral integrity.
THE PRINCIPLE OF NO COERCION
EU citizens have the right to have their decisions taken responsibly, freely and voluntarily, on any actions affecting their health. They have the right to decide, whether or not to consent to the administration of a medical product, and “shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks.” They have the right to make decisions according to their own free will, at any time. (1)
(1) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, 1997 (Article 6)
The European Court of Human Rights has emphasised that a person’s bodily integrity concerns the most intimate aspects of one’s private life. (2)
(2) European Court of Human Rights Guide for article 8 – 31 august 2020 https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_8_ENG.pdf
The Digital Certificate clearly constrains EU citizens to make certain decisions about their health.
The Proposal not only underestimates their decision-making capacities and their responsibility for their health, but also sets up a condition on free movement if citizens do not allow intrusions into their body integrity.
Free movement is a fundamental right in the EU. If the Proposal allows free movement only to those who submit to medical interferences, this equals to use the coercive force in a covert and unacceptable way.
Indeed, the combined effects of the forced permanent testing and the impossibility to travel in the absence of a health test, strongly pressures the population to accept vaccination as the only sustainable solution to exercise their right to travel. This is therefore de facto, though not de jure coercion to get vaccinated.
As we see it, this Proposal of Digital Certificate tears fundamental rights apart from us and imposes a series of constraints i.e., an endless chain of testing or forced vaccination which violate the right to bodily integrity.
This is nothing to do with free will, consent or respect of fundamental rights. It is coercion.
THE PRINCIPLE OF HABEAS CORPUS MUST BE RESPECTED IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES
The Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum et recipiendum[1] states a fundamental right, according to which no one can be imprisoned without trial, as opposed to arbitrariness, which allows anyone to be arrested without just cause. Under the principle, anyone arrested has the right to know why he or she is arrested and what he or she is accused of.
[1] The origins of the "Habeas Corpus" go back to ancient Rome with the provocatio, which is its precursor, and its modern principle was born in english medieval Age.
No one shall be arbitrarily arrested, detained or exiled.
The judicial authority, guardian of individual freedom, ensures the respect of this principle under the conditions provided for by the law.
The Habeas Corpus proclaims the intervention of the judicial power in matters of individual /personal freedom and entrusts the judicial authority with the task of ensuring its protection.
In other words:
The law has the right to defeat only those actions that are harmful to society.
With the implementation of the EU Digital Certificate, EU citizens will be deprived of basic freedoms (ie home arrest) if they do not agree in showing a negative RT-PCR test, a proof of vaccination or a proof of recovery from illness.