Dr Mike Yeadon - fraud, fear and how herd mentality has brought us to the edge

839 Views - Published on 07 Aug, 2022
⁣We are always told to trust the science and listen to the experts.
If only our governments had listened to our guest this episode, Dr Mike Yeadon, whose credentials are impressive.
His time as Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer along with his PhD in respiratory research should make everyone sit up and take notice of what he says.
In this discussion Dr Yeadon gives an overview of where we are with this so-called ‘pandemic’ and shares his view on how we have been lied to, how fear has been used to control us and how herd mentality has shut down debate and conversation.
It is an honour to have Mike join Hearts of Oak to share his wisdom and insight.
Please share this interview widely.
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with over 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.
Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.
Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.
Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.
Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
Interview recorded 21.7.22
Audio Podcast version available at ⁣https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ and all major podcast directories.
To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestream platforms and more go to https://heartsofoak.org/find-us/
Dr. Mike Yeadon summarizes the fundamental errors with the COVID jabs:
1. It induces production of the spike protein, which is the most toxic part of the alleged virus. It's not just one pharmaceutical giant that chose this particular protein, but all four of them (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson, and AstraZeneca).
Not only is the spike protein highly toxic, but the protein induced by the jabs is a synthetically modified version of this protein, which is engineered to be much more stable. It has been shown to stay in the body for at least 60 days, which was the duration of the particular study. It could stay around much longer.
In a natural infection in a healthy person, most of the toxic proteins will be stopped in the respiratory tract which is fairly robust. However, with the genetic injections, the toxic product can go right to the most vulnerable areas of the body, such as the heart, brain and nerves.
The difference between the two is night and day. It's like the Trojan horse outside the thick walls versus inside the thick walls with all the defenders asleep.
2. Because this is such a radically different novel genetic technology that has never before been tested at scale, potential risks are totally unpredictable. (You don't know what you don't know.) Even if you have some short term safety data in a small cohort, you don't know anything about rare events and medium to long term risks.
The lack of safety data might be acceptable if the best alternative were even worse, i.e. a highly transmissible and virulent (=sick making) disease. This is not the case at all with COVID.
First of all, the vast majority of the population is at negligible risk, yet still there is a strong push to get these people injected. Why?
Second of all, there are harmless, highly effective alternatives to reduce the risk of severe disease and death to basically zero, even for the extremely high risk group.
3. The genetic code being injected, induces the body to make spike proteins. First of all, it's totally unpredictable how much will be produced. Some people may make only a little, while others may make an enormous amount.
Second of all, there's no off-switch. Normal mRNA is broken down after at most a few hours, but the mRNA in the jabs is synthetically modified to be much more stable. Just like the spike proteins mentioned under point (1) above, it hangs around for 60 days or longer and may keep inducing the body to make toxic spike proteins for this duration.
Mike makes an excellent analogy: "It's alike a go-kart with a brick on the throttle and you let it go. No one's steering it, and it's going around and around like in a toddler's playground."
Third, it's unpredictable where in the body the spike protein will be made and where they will end up. If it's made in the shoulder muscle and stays there, it may be relatively safe. However, if they're made in or go to the ovaries, for example, you may become irreversibly infertile.
4. A retired R&D pharmaceutical manufacturing guru friend of Mike Yeadon has said:
"It would take some YEARS to be able to prototype, improve and make firm the manufacturing process alone for multiple billions of doses of a complex biological molecule. It's not possible [to get a reliably consistent production process within a short time span]. You can't squirt it in there, stir it and put it into glass vials. What you would end up with is a product that is so variable that it would be reckless to begin injecting it."
This lack of consistent production quality might explain the strong signal of 'hot lots', i.e. vaxx batches that have a much higher (severe) adverse event rates than other batches. It might also explain why a few analyses of the substances in the vials shows no possibility of genetic material being present at all, because the required atoms are absent.
The "errors" that Mike Yeadon points out are only errors if public health is your main priority. If short term profit maximization or depopulation is your main priority, they are not errors. In fact, in the latter case, they may be intentional.
Fauci urges caution when introducing new vaccine: Harms may take decade to become apparent (1999)
SOURCE: https://rumble.com/v1ee8yv


7 K
Authentication required

You must log in to post a comment.

Log in